She didn't have a hall pass and then skipped school altogether. She's gonna ruin her future and when you're homeless, you won't get to fuck cute girls at all.
to add to the discussion in the comments, i think there's a huge distinction between making porn of real, non-consenting people and making porn of fictional characters acted by people. porn of these characters isn't much different from porn of a character who has a voice actor behind them. sure, vtubing is a lot more involved than just voice acting but at the end of the day those people are far enough disconnected from the persona they put on that it's not as bad as it could be. though that's just my opinion.
I feel, the real problem with it is that the persona is an exaggerated caricature of a REAL PERSON. If you put on an exaggerated personality for your friends, you wouldn't want porn to be made from that personality. (Not a perfect analogy, but you get the picture)
I think the distinction to be made between consenting and non-consenting sex is still there, even if the characters are fictional. The morals remain unchanged and potential messages do, too. A few pieces of evidence to back up the fact that fictional characters can still be used as moral guides and can still impressionate their audiences: Smokey the Bear, Protagonists in movies with lessons, and the fucking Muppets.
There is a big difference between protagonist & good guy, McBeth is the protagonist of McBeth, but very much not the good guy.
Not all stories are intended to have lessons, and not all should, if Shakespeare doesn't have to worry about morals, then I don't think porn comics should have to either.
i'm not talking about non-con. i'm talking specifically about people who did not consent to have their image depicted sexually. really, vtubers aren't even trying to be correct depictions of the people behind them.
On one hand: You're an anon, therefore your opinion is invalid.
On the other hand: The same logic applies to creators such as Jaiden Animations. It may be a digital avatar being depicted, but there's an actual human behind it with real feelings. Not just an empty void that is a fictional character.
Add new comment
Best thing I've seen all day
battleship tag is the best tag ever
Are the AmeSame team still seething over AmeGi?
weirdest. femdom. comic. ever.
This is peak
Good comic but the pacing is a bit off to me
I really enjoyed reading this it felt like I have feelings again.
I'm usually not into sesbian lex at all, but the art in this is ridiculously good. The artist must be incredibly talented. 12/10
Da fuck is Sesbian? Explain. (I know it's a typo)
You definitely aren't old enough if you don't get the joke
It took a long time, but it made me horny
She didn't have a hall pass and then skipped school altogether. She's gonna ruin her future and when you're homeless, you won't get to fuck cute girls at all.
Nah i think she could become a succful pimp
Ok, that was a nice couple pages, see y'all in 2 years when the next couple pages come out
Sesbian Lex has never been so good until now
help i need more of this <33
This is a great comic can't wait to see how it continues
to add to the discussion in the comments, i think there's a huge distinction between making porn of real, non-consenting people and making porn of fictional characters acted by people. porn of these characters isn't much different from porn of a character who has a voice actor behind them. sure, vtubing is a lot more involved than just voice acting but at the end of the day those people are far enough disconnected from the persona they put on that it's not as bad as it could be. though that's just my opinion.
I feel, the real problem with it is that the persona is an exaggerated caricature of a REAL PERSON. If you put on an exaggerated personality for your friends, you wouldn't want porn to be made from that personality. (Not a perfect analogy, but you get the picture)
I think the distinction to be made between consenting and non-consenting sex is still there, even if the characters are fictional. The morals remain unchanged and potential messages do, too. A few pieces of evidence to back up the fact that fictional characters can still be used as moral guides and can still impressionate their audiences: Smokey the Bear, Protagonists in movies with lessons, and the fucking Muppets.
There is a big difference between protagonist & good guy, McBeth is the protagonist of McBeth, but very much not the good guy.
Not all stories are intended to have lessons, and not all should, if Shakespeare doesn't have to worry about morals, then I don't think porn comics should have to either.
i'm not talking about non-con. i'm talking specifically about people who did not consent to have their image depicted sexually. really, vtubers aren't even trying to be correct depictions of the people behind them.
surp mucho surp mucho
COIN CARD
On one hand: Hot Sesbian Lex
On the other hand: These are real people being depicted.
They knew what they were signing up for when they decided to use the Internet and get popular. Rule 34 after all, it does not care
Bro, what? this is just a false statement. These are avatars of real people. OC's if you will.
Honestly, you both have a point. It's like sexualizing a streamer - they're both a crazier, more fake persona and an actual human being.
i still fapping to it tho
okay you specifically can have your point validated
On one hand: You're an anon, therefore your opinion is invalid.
On the other hand: The same logic applies to creators such as Jaiden Animations. It may be a digital avatar being depicted, but there's an actual human behind it with real feelings. Not just an empty void that is a fictional character.
exactly. just because it's a fictional character does not make them exempt from common international law.
Pages